XSOE vs. XCEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSOE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XSOE tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while XCEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSOE returned 10.77%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for XCEM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSOE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XCEM.

Performance

XSOE vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSOE achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 38.32% return. Over the past 10 years, XSOE has underperformed XCEM with an annualized return of 10.77%, while XCEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.

XSOE

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.84%
• YTD: 27.99%
• 6M: 30.83%
• 1Y: 54.87%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: 5.06%
• 10Y*: 10.77%

XCEM

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 12.13%
• YTD: 38.32%
• 6M: 44.13%
• 1Y: 71.14%
• 3Y*: 26.37%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSOE vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSOE WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	27.99%	30.05%	7.02%	10.28%	-25.83%	-5.92%	28.61%	24.81%	-18.60%	49.23%
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	38.32%	34.05%	0.42%	19.96%	-17.59%	7.87%	9.47%	19.74%	-11.75%	34.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XSOE and XCEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015	0.76

The correlation between XSOE and XCEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSOE vs. XCEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSOE	XCEM
Technology	37.3%	1.1%
Financial Services	15.5%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	1.1%
Industrials	9.6%	0.4%
Communication Services	7.0%	4.2%
Basic Materials	5.3%	0.7%
Healthcare	4.4%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	0.3%
Energy	2.0%	0.2%
Utilities	1.4%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

XSOE vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSOE

XSOE Risk / Return Rank: 82
XSOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XSOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XSOE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XSOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XSOE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

XCEM

XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSOE vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSOE	XCEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	3.42	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	4.27	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.61	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	4.95	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.84	19.98	-4.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSOE vs. XCEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the XCEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSOE and XCEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSOE	XCEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	3.42	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.68	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.66	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.63	-0.23

Drawdowns

XSOE vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSOE drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE and XCEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSOE	XCEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.23%	-41.24%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.31%	-14.46%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.96%	-18.92%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.05%	-29.67%	-12.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.23%	-41.24%	-3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-1.25%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.28%	-8.59%	-8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.57%	-0.10%

Volatility

XSOE vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) is 8.57%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that XSOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSOE	XCEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	9.43%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.24%	18.72%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	20.89%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.43%	17.75%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	19.72%	+0.87%

XSOE vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSOE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSOE vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison

XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than XCEM's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	2.35%	3.25%	2.76%	1.22%	2.42%	1.94%	1.63%	2.11%	2.70%	9.56%	1.24%	2.63%
XSOE WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	1.28%	1.50%	1.44%	1.78%	2.53%	1.36%	1.02%	2.01%	1.56%	0.65%	1.43%	3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSOE and XCEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, XSOE and XCEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XSOE or XCEM?

XCEM has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to XSOE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSOE dropped -45.23% vs XCEM's -41.24%.

Which ETF is better, XSOE or XCEM?

On 10-year performance, XCEM leads with 12.99% vs 10.77% for XSOE. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, XSOE has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSOE or XCEM?

Over the 10-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSOE or XCEM?

XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XSOE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSOE or XCEM?

XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.28% for XSOE.

What is the main difference between XSOE and XCEM?

XSOE tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSOE and 0.16% for XCEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.