PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSOE vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSOE vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSOE achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.


XSOE

1D
-1.31%
1M
9.84%
YTD
27.99%
6M
30.83%
1Y
54.87%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
10.77%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSOE vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
27.99%30.05%7.02%10.28%-25.83%-5.92%28.61%24.81%-11.56%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XSOE and NTSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.64

The correlation between XSOE and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSOE vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSOE
NTSX

Technology

37.3%
35.1%

Financial Services

15.5%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
10.1%

Industrials

9.6%
7.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
12.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.5%

Energy

2.0%
3.5%

Utilities

1.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.5%

Technology

XSOE
37.3%
NTSX
35.1%

Financial Services

XSOE
15.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XSOE
12.6%
NTSX
10.1%

Industrials

XSOE
9.6%
NTSX
7.7%

Communication Services

XSOE
7.0%
NTSX
12.5%

Basic Materials

XSOE
5.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Healthcare

XSOE
4.4%
NTSX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

XSOE
3.8%
NTSX
5.5%

Energy

XSOE
2.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Utilities

XSOE
1.4%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

XSOE
1.0%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSOE vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSOE
XSOE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XSOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSOE vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSOENTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.77

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

12.25

+3.59

XSOE vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSOE and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSOENTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.06

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.57

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Drawdowns

XSOE vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSOE drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSOENTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-31.34%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-9.16%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-16.82%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.05%

-31.34%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.05%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.28%

-6.79%

-10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.07%

+1.40%

Volatility

XSOE vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that XSOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSOENTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

3.39%

+5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

9.58%

+7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

12.31%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.04%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

18.27%

+2.32%

XSOE vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSOE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSOE vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.28%1.50%1.44%1.78%2.53%1.36%1.02%2.01%1.56%0.65%1.43%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSOE and NTSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSOE has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSOE dropped -45.23% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 5.06% for XSOE. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XSOE.

XSOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

XSOE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSOE and 0.20% for NTSX.

XSOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSOE and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer