PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSOE vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSOE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSOE achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 41.72% return.


XSOE

1D
-1.31%
1M
9.84%
YTD
27.99%
6M
30.83%
1Y
54.87%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
10.77%

EMXC

1D
-1.00%
1M
12.61%
YTD
41.72%
6M
46.94%
1Y
77.94%
3Y*
29.08%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSOE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
27.99%30.05%7.02%10.28%-25.83%-5.92%28.61%24.81%-18.60%11.27%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
41.72%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XSOE and EMXC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.86

The correlation between XSOE and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSOE vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSOE
EMXC

Technology

37.3%
45.0%

Financial Services

15.5%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
4.5%

Industrials

9.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

7.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

5.3%
6.8%

Healthcare

4.4%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
2.9%

Energy

2.0%
4.2%

Utilities

1.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.0%

Technology

XSOE
37.3%
EMXC
45.0%

Financial Services

XSOE
15.5%
EMXC
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XSOE
12.6%
EMXC
4.5%

Industrials

XSOE
9.6%
EMXC
8.3%

Communication Services

XSOE
7.0%
EMXC
3.4%

Basic Materials

XSOE
5.3%
EMXC
6.8%

Healthcare

XSOE
4.4%
EMXC
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

XSOE
3.8%
EMXC
2.9%

Energy

XSOE
2.0%
EMXC
4.2%

Utilities

XSOE
1.4%
EMXC
2.3%

Real Estate

XSOE
1.0%
EMXC
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSOE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSOE
XSOE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XSOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSOE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSOEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.64

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

5.44

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

21.99

-6.15

XSOE vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSOE and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSOEEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

3.61

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.74

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.55

-0.14

Drawdowns

XSOE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSOE drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSOE and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSOEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-42.81%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-14.41%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-19.12%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.05%

-28.91%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.28%

-10.19%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

3.56%

-0.09%

Volatility

XSOE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) is 8.57%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that XSOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSOEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

9.88%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

19.34%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

21.70%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.45%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

19.82%

+0.77%

XSOE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSOE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSOE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than EMXC's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.99%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.28%1.50%1.44%1.78%2.53%1.36%1.02%2.01%1.56%0.65%1.43%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XSOE and EMXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to XSOE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSOE dropped -45.23% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.76% vs 5.06% for XSOE. On fees, XSOE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XSOE has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSOE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.28% for XSOE.

XSOE tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XSOE and 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSOE and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer