PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XSNR.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 12.04%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


XSNR.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.55%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
12.04%

XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
7.81%20.64%5.20%21.57%-14.54%21.19%12.17%27.37%-12.09%21.42%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XSNR.L and XDJP.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013

0.54

The correlation between XSNR.L and XDJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSNR.L
XDJP.L

Industrials

97.5%
19.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
12.4%

Financial Services

1.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.3%

Technology

0.5%
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
16.9%

Energy

0.3%
0.3%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Industrials

XSNR.L
97.5%
XDJP.L
19.4%

Communication Services

XSNR.L
3.0%
XDJP.L
12.4%

Financial Services

XSNR.L
1.6%
XDJP.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

XSNR.L
0.7%
XDJP.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSNR.L
0.5%
XDJP.L
3.3%

Technology

XSNR.L
0.5%
XDJP.L
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XSNR.L
0.5%
XDJP.L
16.9%

Energy

XSNR.L
0.3%
XDJP.L
0.3%

Healthcare

XSNR.L

-

XDJP.L
6.7%

Real Estate

XSNR.L

-

XDJP.L
1.5%

Utilities

XSNR.L

-

XDJP.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSNR.L
XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSNR.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

4.77

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

14.50

-10.18

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSNR.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSNR.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.85

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.71

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.78

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.75

-0.10

Drawdowns

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than XDJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and XDJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSNR.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-23.69%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-13.40%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.10%

-18.82%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-20.61%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-23.69%

-12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-1.35%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-6.79%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

4.42%

-0.37%

Volatility

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) is 6.25%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XSNR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSNR.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

6.75%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.20%

17.68%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

22.44%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

17.72%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

17.63%

+1.26%

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSNR.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XSNR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSNR.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSNR.L.

XSNR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer