XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L
XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and PAVG.L (Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Industrials Equities funds - XSNR.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while PAVG.L tracks the Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSNR.L returned 13.88%/yr vs 20.18%/yr for PAVG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSNR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVG.L.
Performance
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSNR.L is traded in GBp, while PAVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PAVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSNR.L achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than PAVG.L's 16.20% return.
XSNR.L
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 1Y
- 10.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
PAVG.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 6.02% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 3.79% |
PAVG.L Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 16.20% | 12.40% | 19.47% | 24.53% | 4.64% | -24.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSNR.L and PAVG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XSNR.L and PAVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSNR.L
PAVG.L
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (PAVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSNR.L | PAVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.50 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 8.02 | -4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSNR.L drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than PAVG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSNR.L and PAVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSNR.L | PAVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -34.28% | -27.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -10.14% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.10% | -28.81% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -6.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -11.99% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.17% | +1.05% |
Volatility
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (PAVG.L) at 5.51%. This indicates that XSNR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSNR.L | PAVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 5.51% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 13.74% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 17.28% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 23.19% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 23.19% | -4.33% |
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSNR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVG.L's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSNR.L vs. PAVG.L - Dividend Comparison
XSNR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVG.L Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.41% | 0.31% | 0.58% |
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSNR.L and PAVG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSNR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSNR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVG.L.
XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while PAVG.L tracks Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSNR.L and 0.47% for PAVG.L.
Find the right allocation for XSNR.L and PAVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer