XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L
XSLR.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSLR.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSLR.L returned 45.43%/yr vs 28.65%/yr for XNAS.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLR.L achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's 20.49% return.
XSLR.L
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 25.05%
- 1Y
- 112.50%
- 3Y*
- 45.43%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 20.49%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLR.L Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities | 2.41% | 147.42% | 21.28% | -0.78% | 26.56% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.49% | 19.83% | 26.60% | 56.41% | -1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLR.L and XNAS.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSLR.L
XNAS.L
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLR.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.81 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 13.69 | -7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLR.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.64 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.70 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLR.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.L and XNAS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLR.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -22.92% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.77% | -10.91% | -29.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.77% | -22.92% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.69% | -0.08% | -35.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -3.03% | -11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.62% | 3.05% | +15.57% |
Volatility
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.67% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 4.86%. This indicates that XSLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSLR.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.67% | 4.86% | +12.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.52% | 11.69% | +41.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.91% | 15.80% | +40.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.24% | 19.39% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.17% | 19.39% | +15.78% |
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSLR.L and XNAS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSLR.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSLR.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSLR.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSLR.L and XNAS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
XSLR.L is categorized as Silver, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XSLR.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.
Find the right allocation for XSLR.L and XNAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer