PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.DE vs. GLDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSLR.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLR.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's 3.95% return.


XSLR.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
0.98%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
29.60%
1Y
110.52%
3Y*
42.16%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*

GLDI

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
3.95%
6M
4.99%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-2.22%129.87%30.90%-4.25%10.74%-6.08%32.02%
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
3.95%18.31%25.54%5.67%5.02%3.80%-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and GLDI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLR.DEGLDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.54

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

5.59

+0.56

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLR.DE and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLR.DEGLDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.43

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.12

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.47

+0.28

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and GLDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.DEGLDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-27.73%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.56%

-13.17%

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-13.17%

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-13.17%

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.47%

-6.57%

-26.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-8.80%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

3.62%

+14.28%

Volatility

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.38% compared to Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) at 2.55%. This indicates that XSLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.DEGLDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.38%

2.55%

+13.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.92%

12.47%

+39.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.45%

14.23%

+40.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

11.04%

+22.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.14%

11.29%

+21.85%

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

XSLR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
22.94%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLR.DE and GLDI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GLDI.

XSLR.DE is categorized as Silver, while GLDI is Precious Metals. XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.65% for GLDI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLR.DE and GLDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer