XSLR.DE vs. COPJ

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XSLR.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities) and COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSLR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while COPJ is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. XSLR.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for COPJ.

Performance

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XSLR.DE is traded in EUR, while COPJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XSLR.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

COPJ

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -10.95%
• 6M: -14.35%
• YTD: -1.29%
• 1Y: 67.48%
• 3Y*: 33.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XSLR.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities	0.64%
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.DE and COPJ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 50
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSLR.DE	COPJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.71	—

Drawdowns

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.DE drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum COPJ drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.DE and COPJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSLR.DE	COPJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-30.91%	+30.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-23.10%	+23.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-11.57%	+11.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XSLR.DE	COPJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.19%	43.86%	-36.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.19%	34.02%	-26.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.19%	34.02%	-26.83%

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSLR.DE vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

XSLR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	12.06%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%
XSLR.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSLR.DE and COPJ in my portfolio?

XSLR.DE and COPJ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSLR.DE or COPJ?

On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSLR.DE or COPJ?

XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

What is the main difference between XSLR.DE and COPJ?

XSLR.DE is categorized as Silver, while COPJ is Copper. XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.DE and 0.78% for COPJ.