PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLCX vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC (XSLCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLCX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 1.15% return.


XSLCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
1.17%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*

RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSLCX
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
-1.19%4.54%6.88%9.95%-3.06%8.31%1.15%7.58%-0.23%2.53%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.15%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLCX and RPIFX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between XSLCX and RPIFX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLCX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLCX
XSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC (XSLCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSLCXRPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.90

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

3.91

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

14.27

-13.49

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLCX and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLCX drawdown since its inception was -23.53%, smaller than the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLCX and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLCXRPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

-25.10%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-1.44%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.84%

-2.28%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.64%

-5.90%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-0.32%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-1.33%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.39%

+1.19%

Volatility

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC (XSLCX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.57%. This indicates that XSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLCXRPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.57%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

1.74%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

2.38%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

2.76%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

3.80%

+1.10%

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLCX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSLCX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

XSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than RPIFX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
7.02%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%
XSLCX
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
5.25%6.75%8.60%7.87%8.89%4.85%4.32%4.82%5.06%2.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLCX and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSLCX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to RPIFX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSLCX dropped -23.53% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLCX and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer