PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSKR.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSKR.L achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 1.98% return.


XSKR.L

1D
0.08%
1M
2.97%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.35%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
2.84%

IUCM.L

1D
1.48%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
1.98%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSKR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
4.33%9.54%11.64%14.09%-6.11%7.74%-7.30%-1.29%4.03%
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.98%17.47%41.41%47.96%-33.47%23.51%19.04%25.86%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XSKR.L and IUCM.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.37

The correlation between XSKR.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSKR.L
IUCM.L

Communication Services

90.0%
99.1%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XSKR.L
90.0%
IUCM.L
99.1%

Real Estate

XSKR.L
10.1%
IUCM.L

-

Basic Materials

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Energy

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Financial Services

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Healthcare

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Industrials

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Technology

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L
0.6%

Utilities

XSKR.L

-

IUCM.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSKR.L
XSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSKR.LIUCM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.25

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

2.67

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

8.81

-9.69

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSKR.L and IUCM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSKR.LIUCM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

1.52

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.65

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.71

-0.38

Drawdowns

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.21%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSKR.L and IUCM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSKR.LIUCM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

-38.32%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-8.21%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-20.74%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-38.32%

+20.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-4.42%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-8.23%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

2.49%

+4.48%

Volatility

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) at 4.58%. This indicates that XSKR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSKR.LIUCM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.58%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

10.51%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

14.43%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

19.49%

-5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

20.24%

-4.46%

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSKR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSKR.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSKR.L nor IUCM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSKR.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUCM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSKR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSKR.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSKR.L and IUCM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer