PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSI.TO (iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF) and XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XSI.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD, while XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSI.TO returned 2.25%/yr vs 19.70%/yr for XQQ.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSI.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQ.TO.

Performance

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSI.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 19.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XSI.TO has underperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 2.25%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.

XSI.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.25%

XQQ.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.06%
1Y
38.49%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF		0.57%3.82%5.36%7.51%-8.90%0.59%3.70%7.09%-1.07%2.94%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		19.81%18.38%24.23%52.23%-33.67%22.29%45.23%37.48%-2.33%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XSI.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2015

0.25

The correlation between XSI.TO and XQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSI.TO
XQQ.TO

Utilities

93.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

6.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Technology

-

53.7%

Utilities

XSI.TO
93.3%
XQQ.TO
1.4%

Real Estate

XSI.TO
6.7%
XQQ.TO
0.1%

Basic Materials

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
1.1%

Communication Services

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
7.7%

Energy

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
0.6%

Financial Services

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
0.2%

Healthcare

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
4.2%

Industrials

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
3.1%

Technology

XSI.TO

-

XQQ.TO
53.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XSI.TO:
XSI.TO vs. ERNS.LXSI.TO vs. CGHY.TOXSI.TO vs. ZHY.TOXSI.TO vs. ZFH.TOXSI.TO vs. BND.TOXSI.TO vs. XHY.TOXSI.TO vs. XEI.TO
Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

Return for Risk

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSI.TO
XSI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XSI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSI.TOXQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.87
2.45

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.27
3.20

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.03

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

11.31

-7.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSI.TO and XQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSI.TOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.45

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.68

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.89

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.86

-0.52

Drawdowns

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSI.TO and XQQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSI.TOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-38.55%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-12.76%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-22.72%

+19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-38.55%

+26.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.53%

-38.55%

+20.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.27%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-5.92%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

3.41%

-2.62%

Volatility

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) is 1.39%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that XSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSI.TOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

4.48%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

12.00%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

15.82%

-12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

22.52%

-18.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

22.34%

-16.53%

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSI.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSI.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.21%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF		4.36%4.42%4.43%4.28%3.49%2.88%3.04%3.41%3.31%3.22%3.30%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSI.TO and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XSI.TO.

XSI.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XSI.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD, while XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XSI.TO and 0.39% for XQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSI.TO and XQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer