PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) and CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO).

XSI.TO and CGHY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSI.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl HY Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Jan 20, 2015. CGHY.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Apr 1, 2022.

Performance

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) and CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF		-0.36%3.82%5.36%7.51%-8.90%0.59%3.70%7.09%-1.07%2.94%
CGHY.TO
CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series		-0.28%6.19%9.66%13.41%13.50%2.47%-1.13%10.73%-2.45%5.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSI.TO achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CGHY.TO's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XSI.TO has underperformed CGHY.TO with an annualized return of 2.32%, while CGHY.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.78% annualized return.

XSI.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
2.18%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
2.32%

CGHY.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
6.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF

CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series

Often compared with XSI.TO:
XSI.TO vs. ERNS.LXSI.TO vs. ZFH.TOXSI.TO vs. BND.TOXSI.TO vs. ZHY.TOXSI.TO vs. XHY.TOXSI.TO vs. CVD.TOXSI.TO vs. XEI.TO
Often compared with CGHY.TO:
CGHY.TO vs. CCCX.TOCGHY.TO vs. ETHX.TOCGHY.TO vs. CVD.TOCGHY.TO vs. ZHY.TOCGHY.TO vs. WXM.TOCGHY.TO vs. BTCX-B.TOCGHY.TO vs. XHY.TO

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSI.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CGHY.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.

CGHY.TO
CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF

Return for Risk

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSI.TO
XSI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XSI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
CGHY.TO
CGHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CGHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) and CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSI.TOCGHY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.59

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

0.86

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.26

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.90

4.95

-2.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the CGHY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSI.TO and CGHY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSI.TOCGHY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.62

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.44

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between XSI.TO and CGHY.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than CGHY.TO's 5.50% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSI.TO
iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF		4.42%4.42%4.43%4.28%3.49%2.88%3.04%3.41%3.31%3.22%3.30%3.60%
CGHY.TO
CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series		5.50%5.40%4.99%5.14%5.08%6.32%6.08%5.65%5.91%5.45%5.57%5.23%

Drawdowns

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum CGHY.TO drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSI.TO and CGHY.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XSI.TOCGHY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-24.44%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-3.59%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-9.81%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.53%

-24.44%

+5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.85%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.08%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.96%

-0.15%

Volatility

XSI.TO vs. CGHY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Term Strategic Fixed Income ETF (XSI.TO) is 1.91%, while CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that XSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGHY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XSI.TOCGHY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

2.42%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

4.87%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

7.49%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.21%

14.51%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.80%

13.00%

-7.20%