XSHD vs. FLLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSHD (Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) and FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. XSHD is passively managed, while FLLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHD returned -4.65%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for FLLV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSHD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLLV.

Performance

XSHD vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 12.00% return.

XSHD

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 9.16%
• 1Y: 6.83%
• 3Y*: 2.49%
• 5Y*: -4.65%
• 10Y*: —

FLLV

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHD vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	9.24%	-6.41%	-5.25%	3.00%	-19.48%	18.31%	-13.55%	17.91%	-7.86%	1.52%
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF	12.00%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	23.36%	12.33%	32.72%	-2.14%	19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHD and FLLV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016	0.61

The correlation between XSHD and FLLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSHD vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSHD	FLLV
Real Estate	45.6%	2.5%
Utilities	10.8%	2.6%
Industrials	10.5%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.9%	6.1%
Energy	7.1%	4.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	11.0%
Basic Materials	5.6%	2.7%
Healthcare	2.5%	11.6%
Communication Services	2.0%	7.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	13.0%
Technology	-	28.8%

Return for Risk

XSHD vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHD

XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 16
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FLLV

FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHD vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSHD	FLLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	2.85	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	4.13	-3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.52	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	4.91	-4.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	18.21	-16.45

XSHD vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHD and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSHD vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than FLLV's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and FLLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSHD	FLLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.53%	-33.95%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-4.90%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-14.01%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.70%	-18.40%	-16.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.92%	-1.77%	-22.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-3.24%	-13.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	1.32%	+2.57%

Volatility

XSHD vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.76%. This indicates that XSHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSHD	FLLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	2.76%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	6.18%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.93%	8.46%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	13.28%	+5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	15.66%	+6.54%

XSHD vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSHD vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

XSHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than FLLV's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF	4.78%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	5.22%	6.45%	7.25%	7.62%	6.77%	3.86%	5.55%	4.88%	5.49%	4.11%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSHD and FLLV in my portfolio?

XSHD and FLLV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSHD or FLLV?

XSHD has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to FLLV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

Which ETF is better, XSHD or FLLV?

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 10.85% vs -4.65% for XSHD. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSHD or FLLV?

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs -4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSHD or FLLV?

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSHD or FLLV?

XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 4.78% for FLLV.

What is the main difference between XSHD and FLLV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XSHD and 0.29% for FLLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.