PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSEN.L is traded in GBp, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSEN.L having a 30.06% return and WDEE.L slightly higher at 30.50%.


XSEN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
4.07%
YTD
30.06%
6M
26.53%
1Y
46.74%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*

WDEE.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
30.50%
6M
26.32%
1Y
40.90%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
30.06%1.87%6.67%-3.49%
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
30.46%1.24%5.84%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEN.L and WDEE.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.91

The correlation between XSEN.L and WDEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEN.L
XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSEN.LWDEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.43

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

10.75

-2.17

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEN.L and WDEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSEN.LWDEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.09

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.67

-0.33

Drawdowns

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEN.L and WDEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSEN.LWDEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-21.91%

-40.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-11.86%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-21.91%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.31%

-5.47%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-7.26%

-10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

3.79%

+1.53%

Volatility

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that XSEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSEN.LWDEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

7.32%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

15.99%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

19.54%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

19.34%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

19.34%

+10.09%

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSEN.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison

XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while WDEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
2.08%2.70%2.70%3.24%3.69%3.27%7.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSEN.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WDEE.L.

XSEN.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSEN.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEN.L and WDEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer