PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSEN.L vs. INDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSEN.L vs. INDA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSEN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSEN.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSEN.L returned 21.37%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for INDA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSEN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.

Performance

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSEN.L is traded in GBp, while INDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INDA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEN.L achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -11.53% return.

XSEN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
4.07%
YTD
30.06%
6M
26.53%
1Y
46.74%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
—

INDA

1D
-0.80%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
-11.53%
6M
-12.34%
1Y
-11.10%
3Y*
1.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		30.06%1.87%6.67%-5.89%82.86%50.90%-35.95%5.01%-12.11%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF		-11.53%-4.64%10.53%11.30%1.88%22.50%11.45%2.44%6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEN.L and INDA is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.12

The correlation between XSEN.L and INDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSEN.L
INDA

Energy

100.0%
9.5%

Basic Materials

-

8.0%

Communication Services

-

4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.2%

Financial Services

-

28.4%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

10.3%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Energy

XSEN.L
100.0%
INDA
9.5%

Basic Materials

XSEN.L

-

INDA
8.0%

Communication Services

XSEN.L

-

INDA
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSEN.L

-

INDA
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSEN.L

-

INDA
6.2%

Financial Services

XSEN.L

-

INDA
28.4%

Healthcare

XSEN.L

-

INDA
6.2%

Industrials

XSEN.L

-

INDA
10.3%

Real Estate

XSEN.L

-

INDA
1.4%

Technology

XSEN.L

-

INDA
8.3%

Utilities

XSEN.L

-

INDA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D

iShares MSCI India ETF

Often compared with XSEN.L:
XSEN.L vs. GXLE.LXSEN.L vs. EYED.LXSEN.L vs. CWEU.LXSEN.L vs. NCLP.LXSEN.L vs. EXUS.LXSEN.L vs. RNRU.LXSEN.L vs. XLEP.L
Often compared with INDA:
INDA vs. FLININDA vs. INDYINDA vs. EPIINDA vs. SMININDA vs. VOOINDA vs. MCHIINDA vs. VNM

Return for Risk

XSEN.L vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSEN.L
XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSEN.LINDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.92
-0.78

+2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.37
-1.07

+3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.88

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.62

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

-1.35

+9.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the INDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEN.L and INDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSEN.LINDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

-0.78

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.24

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.36

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.29

+0.05

Drawdowns

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEN.L and INDA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSEN.LINDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-37.54%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-17.95%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-22.30%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.04%

-22.30%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.31%

-19.96%

+10.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-8.32%

-9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

8.26%

-2.94%

Volatility

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 4.86%. This indicates that XSEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSEN.LINDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

4.86%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

12.14%

+8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

14.32%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

14.72%

+11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

20.83%

+8.60%

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSEN.L vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison

XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF		0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		2.08%2.70%2.70%3.24%3.69%3.27%7.11%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSEN.L and INDA have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

XSEN.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. XSEN.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSEN.L and 0.69% for INDA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEN.L and INDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer