PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSEA.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - XSEA.TO tracks the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD while QDX.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSEA.TO returned 10.75%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for QDX.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSEA.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDX.TO.

Performance

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSEA.TO having a 9.71% return and QDX.TO slightly higher at 10.16%.

XSEA.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.39%
YTD
9.71%
6M
9.76%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
—

QDX.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.16%
6M
10.81%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSEA.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF		9.71%23.72%11.92%15.28%-8.97%11.09%6.08%8.09%
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF		10.16%25.29%12.93%13.66%-8.61%11.24%5.06%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XSEA.TO and QDX.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019

0.63

Over the past year, XSEA.TO and QDX.TO have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSEA.TO
QDX.TO

Financial Services

25.3%
24.0%

Industrials

16.6%
19.8%

Technology

12.0%
10.4%

Healthcare

9.3%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.7%

Basic Materials

4.7%
6.1%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
4.2%

Utilities

2.8%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.2%

Financial Services

XSEA.TO
25.3%
QDX.TO
24.0%

Industrials

XSEA.TO
16.6%
QDX.TO
19.8%

Technology

XSEA.TO
12.0%
QDX.TO
10.4%

Healthcare

XSEA.TO
9.3%
QDX.TO
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSEA.TO
7.5%
QDX.TO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSEA.TO
6.3%
QDX.TO
6.7%

Basic Materials

XSEA.TO
4.7%
QDX.TO
6.1%

Communication Services

XSEA.TO
3.8%
QDX.TO
4.5%

Energy

XSEA.TO
3.1%
QDX.TO
4.2%

Utilities

XSEA.TO
2.8%
QDX.TO
3.9%

Real Estate

XSEA.TO
1.7%
QDX.TO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF

Often compared with XSEA.TO:
XSEA.TO vs. XDSR.TOXSEA.TO vs. XSEM.TOXSEA.TO vs. XSUS.TOXSEA.TO vs. ESGDXSEA.TO vs. XAW.TOXSEA.TO vs. XEU.TOXSEA.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Often compared with QDX.TO:
QDX.TO vs. QDXH.TOQDX.TO vs. FCRI.TOQDX.TO vs. TILV.TOQDX.TO vs. QTIP.NEOQDX.TO vs. RIDH.TOQDX.TO vs. XMV.TOQDX.TO vs. ZXM.TO

Return for Risk

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSEA.TO
XSEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XSEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
QDX.TO
QDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSEA.TOQDX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
1.65

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.16
2.41

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.16

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

8.46

-1.32

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEA.TO and QDX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSEA.TOQDX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.65

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.56

+0.06

Drawdowns

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, roughly equal to the maximum QDX.TO drawdown of -28.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEA.TO and QDX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSEA.TOQDX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-28.08%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-10.88%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-14.25%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.70%

-23.00%

-4.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.72%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-4.54%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.78%

+0.23%

Volatility

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XSEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) at 4.80%. This indicates that XSEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSEA.TOQDX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

4.80%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

12.00%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

14.28%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

13.94%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

15.48%

+1.39%

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEA.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QDX.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSEA.TO vs. QDX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than QDX.TO's 2.63% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF		2.63%2.51%2.48%2.61%2.73%2.25%1.91%2.76%3.03%
XSEA.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE Index ETF		2.21%2.43%2.90%2.64%2.35%2.12%1.40%2.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSEA.TO and QDX.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XSEA.TO.

XSEA.TO tracks Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XSEA.TO and 0.17% for QDX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSEA.TO and QDX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer