XSD vs. EWY
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 30.26%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
XSD vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 88.46% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed EWY with an annualized return of 30.26%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.84% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 88.46%
- 6M
- 84.83%
- 1Y
- 147.81%
- 3Y*
- 40.43%
- 5Y*
- 27.60%
- 10Y*
- 30.26%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
XSD vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 88.46% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and EWY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XSD and EWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSD vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
EWY
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSD
EWY
Energy
XSD
EWY
Basic Materials
XSD
-
EWY
Communication Services
XSD
-
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
EWY
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
EWY
Financial Services
XSD
-
EWY
Healthcare
XSD
-
EWY
Industrials
XSD
-
EWY
Real Estate
XSD
-
EWY
-
Utilities
XSD
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
EWY
XSD vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.59 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.99 | 8.65 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.64 | 30.24 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -74.14% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -23.08% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -27.36% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -48.55% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -49.73% | +7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -8.88% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -20.11% | +6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 6.59% | -1.02% |
Volatility
XSD vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) is 20.05%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that XSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.05% | 25.64% | -5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.79% | 42.65% | -10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.14% | 46.51% | -7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.80% | 30.15% | +8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.26% | 28.06% | +7.20% |
XSD vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and EWY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to XSD (20.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.26% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSD has been the lower-risk option at 20.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.26% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 3.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer