XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L
XSCS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XSCS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSCS.L returned 8.04%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSCS.L achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.89% return.
XSCS.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 7.09% | -3.23% | 16.15% | -5.00% | 11.79% | 19.16% | 5.49% | 22.78% | 11.73% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.89% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.57% | 19.62% | 14.63% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSCS.L and SGLN.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XSCS.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSCS.L
SGLN.L
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSCS.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.29 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.91 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | 5.05 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSCS.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.45 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.23 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSCS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCS.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSCS.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -41.71% | +26.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -17.57% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.68% | -17.57% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.94% | -17.57% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -16.01% | +8.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -14.76% | +10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 6.67% | -2.89% |
Volatility
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that XSCS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSCS.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 5.08% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 20.08% | -8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 23.19% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 16.30% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.78% | -1.38% |
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSCS.L and SGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSCS.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSCS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 1.95% | 2.11% | 2.15% | 2.20% | 2.96% | 1.95% | 2.99% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSCS.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSCS.L and SGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
XSCS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. XSCS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XSCS.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer