PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSCS.L is traded in GBp, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSCS.L achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than CSTP.L's 5.20% return.


XSCS.L

1D
1.50%
1M
0.90%
6M
5.71%
YTD
11.38%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*

CSTP.L

1D
0.89%
1M
4.38%
6M
5.57%
YTD
5.20%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
3.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
11.38%-3.23%16.15%-5.00%11.79%19.16%5.49%22.78%11.73%
CSTP.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
5.20%12.89%-6.80%-1.33%-3.12%13.11%2.22%17.61%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XSCS.L and CSTP.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2018

0.56

The correlation between XSCS.L and CSTP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCS.L
XSCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CSTP.L
CSTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSCS.LCSTP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.64

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

1.37

+1.01

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCS.L and CSTP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum CSTP.L drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCS.L and CSTP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSCS.LCSTP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-23.51%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-13.44%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-13.44%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.94%

-17.87%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-5.08%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-6.56%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

6.31%

-2.23%

Volatility

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XSCS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) have volatilities of 5.67% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSCS.LCSTP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

5.51%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

11.91%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

14.38%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

13.14%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

13.96%

+0.50%

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSCS.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison

XSCS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while CSTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CSTP.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
1.88%2.11%2.15%2.20%2.96%1.95%2.99%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSCS.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSCS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CSTP.L.

XSCS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSCS.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSCS.L and CSTP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer