PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSCD.L is traded in GBp, while CDIS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CDIS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSCD.L achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly higher than CDIS.L's -10.46% return.


XSCD.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-3.35%
YTD
-0.88%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*

CDIS.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
-2.19%
6M
-7.32%
YTD
-10.46%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
-3.20%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
-0.88%-0.97%33.66%35.72%-30.79%23.01%46.74%23.50%4.83%
CDIS.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
-10.46%7.41%-1.06%12.84%-11.41%15.19%12.11%24.94%-14.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XSCD.L and CDIS.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2018

0.57

The correlation between XSCD.L and CDIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCD.L
XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CDIS.L
CDIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CDIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CDIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSCD.LCDIS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.99

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

-0.12

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

-0.25

+1.80

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the CDIS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCD.L and CDIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CDIS.L drawdown of -35.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCD.L and CDIS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSCD.LCDIS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.13%

-35.47%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-21.89%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.07%

-23.45%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

-29.11%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-14.42%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-8.33%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

10.37%

-5.11%

Volatility

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (CDIS.L) at 5.46%. This indicates that XSCD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSCD.LCDIS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

5.46%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

16.14%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

19.42%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

21.00%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

20.18%

+1.33%

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CDIS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSCD.L vs. CDIS.L - Dividend Comparison

XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while CDIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CDIS.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.46%0.44%0.41%0.60%0.87%0.36%0.58%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSCD.L and CDIS.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSCD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CDIS.L.

XSCD.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CDIS.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSCD.L and 0.18% for CDIS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSCD.L and CDIS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer