PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XSB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) is Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while FTS.TO (Fortis Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XSB.TO returned 1.97%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for FTS.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSB.TO achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XSB.TO has underperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 1.97%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

XSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
2.05%
10Y*
1.97%

FTS.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
5.79%
YTD
13.43%
6M
15.37%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF		1.18%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-1.11%5.20%3.20%1.60%0.13%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		13.43%23.93%14.24%4.76%-7.87%21.81%0.04%22.71%2.74%15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XSB.TO and FTS.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.05

The correlation between XSB.TO and FTS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF

Fortis Inc.

Often compared with XSB.TO:
XSB.TO vs. XBB.TOXSB.TO vs. ZAG.TOXSB.TO vs. VSB.TOXSB.TO vs. XSH.TOXSB.TO vs. XCB.TOXSB.TO vs. XLB.TOXSB.TO vs. ZCS.TO
Often compared with FTS.TO:
FTS.TO vs. CU.TOFTS.TO vs. EMA.TOFTS.TO vs. T.TOFTS.TO vs. H.TOFTS.TO vs. VDY.TOFTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TOFTS.TO vs. TRP.TO

Return for Risk

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
FTS.TO
FTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XSB.TOFTS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.62
2.01

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.31
2.89

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.33

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

10.47

-3.19

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSB.TO and FTS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, smaller than the maximum FTS.TO drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSB.TO and FTS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSB.TOFTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-28.27%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-6.09%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-10.97%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.99%

-24.01%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.65%

-28.27%

+19.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-5.71%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

2.51%

-2.07%

Volatility

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) is 0.71%, while Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that XSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSB.TOFTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

4.96%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

10.44%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

13.12%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

14.45%

-11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

16.86%

-13.46%

Dividends

XSB.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than FTS.TO's 3.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		3.18%3.48%3.99%4.19%4.01%3.36%3.73%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF		3.10%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSB.TO and FTS.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSB.TO and FTS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer