PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS8R.L achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XS8R.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of 9.06%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.


XS8R.L

1D
0.01%
1M
8.23%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
-13.03%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
9.06%

XDEQ.L

1D
0.92%
1M
3.13%
YTD
8.63%
6M
8.62%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS8R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-4.42%-7.24%-4.36%34.53%-24.37%25.82%21.50%28.80%-8.50%25.02%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
8.63%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%24.28%11.14%30.48%-5.16%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XS8R.L and XDEQ.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014

0.51

The correlation between XS8R.L and XDEQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS8R.L
XDEQ.L

Technology

100.0%
30.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Energy

-

4.6%

Financial Services

-

14.7%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

XS8R.L
100.0%
XDEQ.L
30.4%

Basic Materials

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
3.2%

Communication Services

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
5.3%

Energy

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
4.6%

Financial Services

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
14.7%

Healthcare

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
9.2%

Industrials

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
10.1%

Real Estate

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
1.7%

Utilities

XS8R.L

-

XDEQ.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS8R.L
XS8R.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XS8R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS8R.LXDEQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.43

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

3.21

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

13.32

-14.11

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS8R.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS8R.L and XDEQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS8R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

2.26

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.87

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

1.13

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.21

-0.85

Drawdowns

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS8R.L drawdown since its inception was -40.78%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS8R.L and XDEQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS8R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.78%

-23.79%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.08%

-6.90%

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-17.96%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-17.96%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-23.79%

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

0.00%

-25.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-3.78%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

1.67%

+14.33%

Volatility

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that XS8R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS8R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

2.57%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

7.12%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

9.81%

+12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

13.37%

+10.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

16.89%

+5.82%

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS8R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XS8R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS8R.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS8R.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS8R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS8R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

XS8R.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. XS8R.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS8R.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS8R.L and XDEQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer