PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XS8R.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS8R.L achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XS8R.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 9.06%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


XS8R.L

1D
0.01%
1M
8.23%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
-13.03%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
9.06%

IWDA.L

1D
0.10%
1M
3.76%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.07%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS8R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-4.42%-7.24%-4.36%34.53%-24.37%25.82%21.50%28.80%-8.50%25.02%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.24%12.41%21.19%18.05%-8.38%23.34%12.65%22.29%-3.62%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XS8R.L and IWDA.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2010

0.64

The correlation between XS8R.L and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS8R.L
IWDA.L

Technology

100.0%
32.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.8%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

14.9%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

XS8R.L
100.0%
IWDA.L
32.9%

Basic Materials

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
2.8%

Communication Services

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
3.9%

Financial Services

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
14.9%

Healthcare

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
8.6%

Industrials

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
9.7%

Real Estate

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
1.2%

Utilities

XS8R.L

-

IWDA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS8R.L
XS8R.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XS8R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS8R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS8R.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.44

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

4.25

-4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

16.00

-16.79

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS8R.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS8R.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS8R.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

2.33

-2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.90

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.90

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.86

-0.50

Drawdowns

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS8R.L drawdown since its inception was -40.78%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS8R.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS8R.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.78%

-26.18%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.08%

-6.37%

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-18.91%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-18.91%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-26.18%

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-0.07%

-25.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-3.39%

-6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

1.70%

+14.30%

Volatility

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Information Technology ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS8R.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that XS8R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS8R.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

3.39%

+3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

8.83%

+10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

11.60%

+11.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

14.49%

+9.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

15.51%

+7.20%

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XS8R.L and IWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XS8R.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS8R.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS8R.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS8R.L and IWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XS8R.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. XS8R.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS8R.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer