XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L
XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L returned 10.57%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for XLFQ.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XS7R.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFQ.L.
Performance
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XS7R.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than XLFQ.L's -4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L has underperformed XLFQ.L with an annualized return of 10.57%, while XLFQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.02% annualized return.
XS7R.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XLFQ.L
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 2.58% | 47.44% | 18.33% | 20.38% | 3.19% | 27.29% | -19.81% | 7.94% | -24.58% | 16.49% |
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | -4.71% | 7.07% | 32.15% | 6.12% | -0.39% | 37.90% | -6.56% | 27.16% | -9.51% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XS7R.L and XLFQ.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XS7R.L and XLFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
Technology
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
Industrials
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
-
Basic Materials
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Communication Services
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Energy
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Healthcare
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Real Estate
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Utilities
XS7R.L
-
XLFQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XS7R.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 0.36 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 0.84 | +5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XS7R.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.33 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.52 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.64 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XS7R.L drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than XLFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS7R.L and XLFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XS7R.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.04% | -35.39% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -12.81% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.17% | -19.01% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -19.01% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -35.39% | -20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -6.62% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.41% | -5.65% | -20.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 5.48% | -2.16% |
Volatility
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) at 4.46%. This indicates that XS7R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XS7R.L | XLFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.46% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 10.48% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 13.91% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 17.52% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 20.14% | +2.38% |
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XS7R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XS7R.L vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XS7R.L nor XLFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XS7R.L and XLFQ.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLFQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS7R.L and 0.14% for XLFQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XS7R.L and XLFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer