XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L
XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Financials Equities funds - XS7R.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while UIFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L returned 10.57%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XS7R.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XS7R.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L has underperformed UIFS.L with an annualized return of 10.57%, while UIFS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.
XS7R.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 2.58% | 47.44% | 18.33% | 20.38% | 3.19% | 27.29% | -19.81% | 7.94% | -24.58% | 16.49% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XS7R.L and UIFS.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XS7R.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
Technology
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
Industrials
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
-
Basic Materials
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Energy
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Healthcare
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Real Estate
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Utilities
XS7R.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XS7R.L
UIFS.L
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XS7R.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 0.36 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 0.83 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XS7R.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.33 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.52 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XS7R.L drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than UIFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS7R.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XS7R.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.04% | -35.31% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -12.90% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.17% | -18.72% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -18.72% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -35.31% | -20.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -6.76% | +4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.41% | -6.08% | -20.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 5.53% | -2.21% |
Volatility
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that XS7R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XS7R.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.41% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 10.58% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 13.98% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 17.54% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 20.12% | +2.40% |
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XS7R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XS7R.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XS7R.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XS7R.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.
XS7R.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS7R.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for XS7R.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer