PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS7R.L vs. FINW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XS7R.L is traded in GBp, while FINW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FINW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS7R.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than FINW.L's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L has underperformed FINW.L with an annualized return of 10.57%, while FINW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return.


XS7R.L

1D
0.42%
1M
3.51%
YTD
2.58%
6M
9.20%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
17.60%
10Y*
10.57%

FINW.L

1D
1.90%
1M
2.56%
YTD
0.66%
6M
3.76%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS7R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
2.58%47.44%18.33%20.38%3.19%27.29%-19.81%7.94%-24.58%16.49%
FINW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS
0.66%19.82%28.50%10.49%0.85%29.82%-5.72%20.28%-12.66%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XS7R.L and FINW.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2011

0.67

The correlation between XS7R.L and FINW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS7R.L
FINW.L

Financial Services

97.1%
14.4%

Technology

1.8%
40.1%

Industrials

1.1%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Communication Services

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

2.6%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Financial Services

XS7R.L
97.1%
FINW.L
14.4%

Technology

XS7R.L
1.8%
FINW.L
40.1%

Industrials

XS7R.L
1.1%
FINW.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XS7R.L
0.3%
FINW.L
11.1%

Basic Materials

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
3.6%

Communication Services

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
10.1%

Energy

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
2.6%

Healthcare

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
3.9%

Real Estate

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
0.5%

Utilities

XS7R.L

-

FINW.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS7R.L
XS7R.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FINW.L
FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS7R.LFINW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.55

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

4.97

+1.62

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FINW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS7R.L and FINW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS7R.LFINW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.08

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.78

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.71

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.62

-0.52

Drawdowns

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS7R.L drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than FINW.L's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS7R.L and FINW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS7R.LFINW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-35.63%

-30.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-9.61%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-16.29%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

-16.29%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.42%

-35.63%

-19.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-5.42%

-20.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.01%

+0.31%

Volatility

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) at 4.06%. This indicates that XS7R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FINW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS7R.LFINW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.06%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

10.98%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

13.79%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

16.53%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

18.21%

+4.31%

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS7R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FINW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XS7R.L vs. FINW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS7R.L nor FINW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS7R.L and FINW.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS7R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS7R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS7R.L and 0.30% for FINW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS7R.L and FINW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer