PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS6R.L achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XS6R.L has underperformed XDEQ.L with an annualized return of 11.52%, while XDEQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.


XS6R.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
10.83%
6M
12.11%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.52%

XDEQ.L

1D
0.92%
1M
4.55%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
10.83%38.34%-1.20%11.55%-3.84%1.17%18.06%22.81%3.39%14.10%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
8.63%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%24.28%11.14%30.48%-5.16%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XS6R.L and XDEQ.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014

0.27

The correlation between XS6R.L and XDEQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS6R.L
XDEQ.L

Utilities

94.7%
2.7%

Industrials

5.3%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Energy

-

4.6%

Financial Services

-

14.7%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

30.4%

Utilities

XS6R.L
94.7%
XDEQ.L
2.7%

Industrials

XS6R.L
5.3%
XDEQ.L
10.1%

Basic Materials

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
3.2%

Communication Services

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
5.3%

Energy

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
4.6%

Financial Services

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
14.7%

Healthcare

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
9.2%

Real Estate

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
1.7%

Technology

XS6R.L

-

XDEQ.L
30.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS6R.L
XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS6R.LXDEQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.21

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

13.32

-4.15

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS6R.L and XDEQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS6R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.26

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.87

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.13

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.21

-0.83

Drawdowns

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS6R.L drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS6R.L and XDEQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS6R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-23.79%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-6.90%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-17.96%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-17.96%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.10%

-23.79%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

0.00%

-6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-3.78%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.67%

+1.34%

Volatility

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that XS6R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS6R.LXDEQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

2.57%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

7.12%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

9.81%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

13.37%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

16.89%

+0.08%

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS6R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XS6R.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS6R.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS6R.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS6R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS6R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

XS6R.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS6R.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS6R.L and XDEQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer