PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS3R.L achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XS3R.L has underperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 2.67%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.44% annualized return.


XS3R.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
-2.78%
1Y
-6.99%
3Y*
-5.12%
5Y*
-2.72%
10Y*
2.67%

XCX5.L

1D
1.26%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-12.76%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
7.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS3R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-2.91%3.47%-13.00%-0.64%-5.40%12.99%-0.56%21.42%-5.95%16.94%
XCX5.L
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-12.70%-5.16%11.92%12.56%2.33%26.19%9.49%2.58%-3.56%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XS3R.L and XCX5.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2010

0.34

The correlation between XS3R.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS3R.L
XCX5.L

Consumer Defensive

97.9%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
12.4%

Basic Materials

-

8.5%

Communication Services

-

4.7%

Energy

-

9.5%

Financial Services

-

28.3%

Healthcare

-

6.1%

Industrials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

8.2%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

XS3R.L
97.9%
XCX5.L
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XS3R.L
2.1%
XCX5.L
12.4%

Basic Materials

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
8.5%

Communication Services

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
4.7%

Energy

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
9.5%

Financial Services

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
28.3%

Healthcare

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
6.1%

Industrials

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
10.2%

Real Estate

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
1.3%

Technology

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
8.2%

Utilities

XS3R.L

-

XCX5.L
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS3R.L
XS3R.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XCX5.L
XCX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS3R.LXCX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.89

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-0.60

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-1.37

+0.45

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS3R.L and XCX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS3R.LXCX5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.76

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.26

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.37

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.23

+0.41

Drawdowns

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS3R.L drawdown since its inception was -30.38%, smaller than the maximum XCX5.L drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS3R.L and XCX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS3R.LXCX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.38%

-41.74%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-19.88%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-26.47%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.57%

-26.47%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.38%

-37.35%

+6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.02%

-23.06%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-11.04%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.61%

8.81%

-1.20%

Volatility

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) have volatilities of 6.13% and 6.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS3R.LXCX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

6.39%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

13.26%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

15.78%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

15.92%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

19.89%

-5.20%

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS3R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XS3R.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS3R.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS3R.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS3R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS3R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.

XS3R.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XS3R.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS3R.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS3R.L and XCX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer