XRSS.L vs. USDV.L
XRSS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XRSS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRSS.L returned 14.67%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRSS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRSS.L is traded in GBp, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSS.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XRSS.L has outperformed USDV.L with an annualized return of 14.67%, while USDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
XRSS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.42% | 9.60% | 28.26% | 22.69% | -11.96% | 29.11% | 12.54% | 25.48% | -5.60% | 7.52% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 7.22% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.52% | 11.58% | 26.74% | -2.72% | 19.69% | 1.49% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSS.L and USDV.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XRSS.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Industrials
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Energy
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Utilities
XRSS.L
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRSS.L
USDV.L
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRSS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.12 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 5.42 | +6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRSS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.44 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.53 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.64 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than USDV.L's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSS.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -27.80% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -6.60% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.42% | -16.30% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -16.30% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.00% | -27.80% | -5.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -3.68% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -4.14% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.58% | +0.03% |
Volatility
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.53%. This indicates that XRSS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSS.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.53% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.80% | 7.19% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 9.69% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 12.78% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 15.33% | +1.42% |
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRSS.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
XRSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRSS.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRSS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRSS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
XRSS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSS.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for XRSS.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer