XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L
XRSS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and MXUD.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRSS.L returned 14.37%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for MXUD.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRSS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MXUD.L.
Performance
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRSS.L is traded in GBp, while MXUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XRSS.L having a 10.42% return and MXUD.L slightly higher at 10.85%.
XRSS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
MXUD.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 28.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.42% | 9.60% | 28.26% | 22.69% | -11.96% | 29.11% | 12.54% | 0.55% |
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 10.85% | 9.07% | 27.65% | 21.47% | -10.39% | 28.01% | 15.33% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSS.L and MXUD.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XRSS.L and MXUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Financial Services
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Communication Services
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Consumer Cyclical
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Healthcare
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Industrials
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Consumer Defensive
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Real Estate
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Energy
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Basic Materials
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Utilities
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRSS.L
MXUD.L
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRSS.L | MXUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.82 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 12.47 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRSS.L | MXUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.41 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than MXUD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSS.L and MXUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSS.L | MXUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -26.88% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -7.54% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.42% | -21.48% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -21.48% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.08% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -3.96% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.32% | +0.29% |
Volatility
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSS.L) is 2.86%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist (MXUD.L) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that XRSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSS.L | MXUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.55% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.80% | 8.62% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 11.93% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 15.67% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 17.70% | -0.95% |
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRSS.L vs. MXUD.L - Dividend Comparison
XRSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MXUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXUD.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF Dist | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 0.62% |
XRSS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XRSS.L and MXUD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MXUD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XRSS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSS.L and 0.05% for MXUD.L.
Find the right allocation for XRSS.L and MXUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer