XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE
XRSM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSM.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRSM.DE returned 13.21%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRSM.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 29.71% return.
XRSM.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 6M
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 48.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSM.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.32% | 4.95% | 33.21% | 25.49% | -17.04% | 39.25% | 5.31% | 33.46% | -6.52% | 1.97% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 29.71% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.58% | 21.91% | -11.16% | -2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSM.DE and XMME.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XRSM.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRSM.DE
XMME.DE
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 4.51 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 15.47 | -5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.30% | -31.95% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -10.68% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -19.16% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -24.39% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -3.80% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -9.78% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 3.12% | -0.66% |
Volatility
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) is 3.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that XRSM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 8.81% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 16.93% | -7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 19.22% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 17.12% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.99% | -0.83% |
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSM.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRSM.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.
XRSM.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRSM.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer