XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE
XRSM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSM.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRSM.DE returned 13.75%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for XDWD.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRSM.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XDWD.DE.
Performance
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 11.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XRSM.DE having a 13.75% annualized return and XDWD.DE not far behind at 13.29%.
XRSM.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSM.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.32% | 4.95% | 33.21% | 25.49% | -17.04% | 39.25% | 5.31% | 33.46% | -6.52% | 3.51% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 11.11% | 7.85% | 25.98% | 20.19% | -13.68% | 32.75% | 5.47% | 31.26% | -4.94% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSM.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XRSM.DE and XDWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRSM.DE
XDWD.DE
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRSM.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 3.90 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 15.65 | -5.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than XDWD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and XDWD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSM.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.30% | -33.55% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -6.34% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -21.64% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -21.64% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.30% | -33.55% | -6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.75% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -4.53% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.58% | +0.88% |
Volatility
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) at 2.93%. This indicates that XRSM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSM.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 2.93% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 7.89% | +1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 11.27% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 14.15% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 15.12% | +3.04% |
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRSM.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRSM.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XRSM.DE and XDWD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
XRSM.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRSM.DE and XDWD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer