PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRS2.DE achieves a 21.81% return, which is significantly higher than SXRV.DE's 18.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XRS2.DE has underperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 10.04%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 20.55% annualized return.


XRS2.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
1.69%
6M
15.19%
YTD
21.81%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
10.04%

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
-2.17%
6M
17.92%
YTD
18.64%
1Y
30.21%
3Y*
23.00%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
20.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRS2.DE
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C
21.81%1.29%15.81%14.81%-16.50%24.61%8.18%28.79%-9.05%0.53%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
18.64%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%39.34%34.48%42.90%3.03%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015

0.69

The correlation between XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRS2.DE
XRS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XRS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRS2.DESXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.00

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

8.66

+4.61

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRS2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than SXRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRS2.DESXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-32.80%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.23%

-10.03%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.77%

-26.69%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-31.33%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-31.33%

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-2.88%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-6.47%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.48%

-0.72%

Volatility

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) is 4.52%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that XRS2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRS2.DESXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

5.78%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

12.46%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

16.99%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

20.01%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

19.72%

+2.63%

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRS2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRS2.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRS2.DE nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRS2.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRS2.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

XRS2.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. XRS2.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XRS2.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRS2.DE and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer