PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XRS2.DE is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRS2.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 12.06% return.


XRS2.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
2.92%
YTD
17.70%
6M
16.56%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.28%

^GSPC

1D
0.00%
1M
4.16%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRS2.DE
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C
17.70%15.68%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.98%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XRS2.DE and ^GSPC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRS2.DE
XRS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XRS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRS2.DE^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRS2.DE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.98

-1.61

Drawdowns

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRS2.DE and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRS2.DE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-7.57%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-1.39%

-8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

Volatility

XRS2.DE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRS2.DE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

12.22%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

12.22%

+8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

12.22%

+9.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRS2.DE and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRS2.DE and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer