XRPZ vs. STBQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) and STBQ (Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF) are both Blockchain funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XRPZ vs. STBQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPZ achieves a -40.13% return, which is significantly lower than STBQ's -15.27% return.

XRPZ

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -10.04%
• 6M: -47.44%
• YTD: -40.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STBQ

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: 2.59%
• 6M: -21.63%
• YTD: -15.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPZ vs. STBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-40.13%	-3.54%
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	-15.27%	-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPZ and STBQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

XRPZ vs. STBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

XRPZ vs. STBQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than STBQ's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPZ and STBQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPZ	STBQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.39%	-33.10%	-22.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.60%	-23.04%	-29.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.91%	-19.41%	-14.50%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRPZ	STBQ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.20%	42.68%	+28.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.20%	42.68%	+28.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.20%	42.68%	+28.52%

Dividends

XRPZ vs. STBQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPZ nor STBQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPZ and STBQ in my portfolio?

XRPZ and STBQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPZ or STBQ?

XRPZ and STBQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XRPZ and STBQ?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Amplify.