XRPT vs. ETHV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPT is actively managed, while ETHV is passively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -87.06% vs -24.80% for ETHV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.

Performance

XRPT vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -68.08% return, which is significantly lower than ETHV's -35.77% return.

XRPT

• 1D: -12.32%
• 1M: -26.08%
• YTD: -68.08%
• 6M: -77.97%
• 1Y: -87.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHV

• 1D: -4.62%
• 1M: -17.19%
• YTD: -35.77%
• 6M: -36.02%
• 1Y: -24.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPT vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	-68.08%	-67.83%
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-35.77%	12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPT and ETHV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025	0.84

The correlation between XRPT and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XRPT vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPT

XRPT Risk / Return Rank: 3
XRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
XRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
XRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 6
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPT vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XRPT	ETHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-0.36	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	-0.11	-0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.99	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.42	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	-0.69	-0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRPT vs. ETHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the ETHV Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPT and ETHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRPT	ETHV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	-0.36	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	-0.38	-0.22

Drawdowns

XRPT vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -94.62%, which is greater than ETHV's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and ETHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPT	ETHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.62%	-64.02%	-30.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.62%	-61.66%	-32.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.62%	-60.63%	-33.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.86%	-32.58%	-30.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	69.95%	37.53%	+32.42%

Volatility

XRPT vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 28.00% compared to VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) at 9.30%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRPT	ETHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.00%	9.30%	+18.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.51%	46.63%	+59.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	150.66%	68.22%	+82.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.69%	72.25%	+77.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.69%	72.25%	+77.44%

XRPT vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPT vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison

XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, while ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	4.87%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPT and ETHV in my portfolio?

XRPT and ETHV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRPT or ETHV?

XRPT has higher volatility (28.00%) compared to ETHV (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -94.62% vs ETHV's -64.02%.

Which ETF is better, XRPT or ETHV?

On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -24.80% vs -87.06% for XRPT. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRPT or ETHV?

Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -24.80% return vs -87.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPT or ETHV?

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPT or ETHV?

XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.

What is the main difference between XRPT and ETHV?

They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.20% for ETHV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.