XRPT vs. ETHD
XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -88.46% vs -40.70% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
XRPT vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -70.47% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 68.24% return.
XRPT
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -33.40%
- YTD
- -70.47%
- 6M
- -78.42%
- 1Y
- -88.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- 73.12%
- YTD
- 68.24%
- 6M
- 77.63%
- 1Y
- -40.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPT vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -70.47% | -67.83% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 68.24% | -64.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPT and ETHD is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025 | -0.84 |
The correlation between XRPT and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.84 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPT vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
XRPT
ETHD
XRPT vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRPT | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.49 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -0.62 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPT | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.30 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.34 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
XRPT vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPT | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -95.59% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.02% | -83.63% | -11.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.02% | -86.85% | -8.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.11% | -66.06% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.46% | 66.08% | +4.38% |
Volatility
XRPT vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 27.84% compared to ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) at 18.57%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPT | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.84% | 18.57% | +9.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.32% | 90.60% | +13.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.33% | 136.04% | +14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 142.06% | +7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 142.06% | +7.13% |
XRPT vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPT vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than ETHD's 10.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.40% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 5.26% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPT and ETHD have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRPT has higher volatility (27.84%) compared to ETHD (18.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -95.02% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -40.70% vs -88.46% for XRPT. On fees, XRPT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, ETHD has been the lower-risk option at 18.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -40.70% return vs -88.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRPT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 5.26% for XRPT.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRPT and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer