XRPT vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XRPT is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -93.84% vs 31.88% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

XRPT vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -74.94% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 29.47% return.

XRPT

• 1D: 8.69%
• 1M: -7.04%
• 6M: -80.96%
• YTD: -74.94%
• 1Y: -93.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 2.44%
• 6M: 29.19%
• YTD: 29.47%
• 1Y: 31.88%
• 3Y*: 28.91%
• 5Y*: 22.84%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPT vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	-74.94%	-67.94%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	29.47%	3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPT and EINC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

XRPT vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPT

XRPT Risk / Return Rank: 2
XRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
XRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
XRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
XRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
XRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 80
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPT vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPT	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	2.08	-2.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	2.83	-4.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.37	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	4.06	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	9.98	-11.20

XRPT vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPT and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRPT vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -96.33%, which is greater than EINC's maximum drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPT	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.33%	-87.55%	-8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.33%	-7.89%	-88.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.77%	-1.85%	-93.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.88%	-44.00%	-21.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	76.76%	3.20%	+73.56%

Volatility

XRPT vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 35.72% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.02%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRPT	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.72%	6.02%	+29.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.57%	12.31%	+91.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.09%	15.40%	+130.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.77%	19.57%	+128.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.77%	25.34%	+122.43%

XRPT vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPT vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than EINC's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.42%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	6.34%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPT and EINC in my portfolio?

XRPT and EINC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRPT or EINC?

XRPT has higher volatility (35.72%) compared to EINC (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -96.33% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, XRPT or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 31.88% vs -93.84% for XRPT. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRPT or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 31.88% return vs -93.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPT or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPT or EINC?

XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 3.42% for EINC.

What is the main difference between XRPT and EINC?

XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.