XRPT vs. CBXO
XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
XRPT vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -70.47% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.71% return.
XRPT
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -33.40%
- YTD
- -70.47%
- 6M
- -78.42%
- 1Y
- -88.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPT vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -70.47% | -67.41% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.71% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPT and CBXO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPT vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
XRPT
CBXO
XRPT vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRPT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -2.36 | +1.75 |
Drawdowns
XRPT vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -11.43% | -83.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.02% | -11.43% | -83.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.11% | -8.47% | -54.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.46% | — | — |
Volatility
XRPT vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPT | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.33% | 7.20% | +143.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 7.20% | +141.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 7.20% | +141.99% |
XRPT vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPT vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 5.26% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPT and CBXO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.
XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for XRPT and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer