XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO
XRPP.TO (Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units) and CCCX.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPP.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX.TO.
Performance
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPP.TO achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than CCCX.TO's -26.82% return.
XRPP.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -45.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCCX.TO
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPP.TO Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units | -34.43% | -38.24% |
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | -26.82% | -25.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPP.TO and CCCX.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units (XRPP.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPP.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -1.04 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPP.TO drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than CCCX.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPP.TO and CCCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPP.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -54.70% | -12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.67% | -50.00% | -16.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.53% | -32.62% | -5.91% |
Volatility
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPP.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.60% | 53.31% | +21.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.60% | 53.31% | +21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.60% | 53.31% | +21.29% |
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPP.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPP.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPP.TO nor CCCX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPP.TO and CCCX.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCCX.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCCX.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for XRPP.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for XRPP.TO and 0.50% for CCCX.TO.
Find the right allocation for XRPP.TO and CCCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer