XRPC vs. SBIT
XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XRPC is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. XRPC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
XRPC vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPC achieves a -34.29% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 37.02% return.
XRPC
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -14.06%
- YTD
- -34.29%
- 6M
- -45.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPC vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | -34.29% | -20.79% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | 17.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPC and SBIT is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPC vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
XRPC
SBIT
XRPC vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPC | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | -0.46 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
XRPC vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPC drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPC and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPC | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.85% | -91.35% | +42.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.24% | -78.26% | +30.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -68.55% | +39.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.69% | — |
Volatility
XRPC vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPC | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 68.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.88% | 87.18% | -11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.88% | 97.47% | -21.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.88% | 97.47% | -21.59% |
XRPC vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPC vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
XRPC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPC and SBIT have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for XRPC.
They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XRPC and 0.95% for SBIT.
Find the right allocation for XRPC and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer