XRP vs. EMLP
XRP (Bitwise XRP ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XRP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. XRP charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
XRP vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRP achieves a -39.52% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 17.45% return.
XRP
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -12.97%
- 6M
- -48.59%
- YTD
- -39.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
XRP vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRP Bitwise XRP ETF | -39.52% | -15.03% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 17.45% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRP and EMLP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRP vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
XRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMLP
XRP vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRP | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRP vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRP drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than EMLP's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRP | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -43.61% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.18% | -1.24% | -50.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -5.73% | -27.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
XRP vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRP | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.85% | 10.29% | +63.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.85% | 14.53% | +59.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.85% | 17.68% | +56.17% |
XRP vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRP vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
XRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.77% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
XRP Bitwise XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRP and EMLP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for XRP.
XRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XRP and 0.96% for EMLP.
Find the right allocation for XRP and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer