XRP vs. EINC
XRP (Bitwise XRP ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. XRP is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. XRP charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EINC.
Performance
XRP vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRP achieves a -41.13% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.81% return.
XRP
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -33.15%
- YTD
- -41.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $754.80K | $2.71M | $2.24M | |
| $5.79M | $6.38M | $8.38M |
XRP vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRP Bitwise XRP ETF | -41.13% | -15.03% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 26.81% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRP and EINC is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRP vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
XRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
XRP vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRP vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRP drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -87.55% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.45% | -3.86% | -49.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.02% | -43.82% | +8.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility
XRP vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.38% | 15.45% | +55.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.38% | 19.49% | +51.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.38% | 25.33% | +46.05% |
XRP vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRP vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
XRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 4.24% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
XRP Bitwise XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRP and EINC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EINC.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.00% for XRP.
XRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XRP and 0.46% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for XRP and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer