XRLX vs. TDSA
XRLX (FundX Conservative ETF) and TDSA (Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XRLX is actively managed, while TDSA is passively managed. XRLX charges 1.63%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TDSA.
Performance
XRLX vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRLX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRLX vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 6.82% |
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% |
XRLX vs. TDSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRLX
TDSA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XRLX
TDSA
Financial Services
XRLX
TDSA
Communication Services
XRLX
TDSA
Consumer Cyclical
XRLX
TDSA
Industrials
XRLX
TDSA
Healthcare
XRLX
TDSA
Consumer Defensive
XRLX
TDSA
Energy
XRLX
TDSA
Utilities
XRLX
TDSA
Basic Materials
XRLX
TDSA
Real Estate
XRLX
TDSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRLX vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank
XRLX
TDSA
XRLX vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRLX | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRLX | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XRLX vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRLX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLX and TDSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLX | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | 0.00% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | 0.00% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility
XRLX vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRLX | TDSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 0.00% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 0.00% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 0.00% | +11.05% |
XRLX vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRLX vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison
XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSA Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF | 2.57% | 2.77% | 1.66% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TDSA is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSA is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.
XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.
They also come from different issuers: FundX and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 1.63% for XRLX and 0.83% for TDSA.
Find the right allocation for XRLX and TDSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer