PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLX vs. TDSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLX vs. TDSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLX

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.47%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.12%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLX vs. TDSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


XRLX vs. TDSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLX
TDSA

Technology

36.8%
24.3%

Financial Services

12.1%
4.7%

Communication Services

11.9%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
8.6%

Industrials

7.1%
6.7%

Healthcare

6.6%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.1%

Energy

3.3%
1.6%

Utilities

3.2%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
35.5%

Technology

XRLX
36.8%
TDSA
24.3%

Financial Services

XRLX
12.1%
TDSA
4.7%

Communication Services

XRLX
11.9%
TDSA
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLX
10.0%
TDSA
8.6%

Industrials

XRLX
7.1%
TDSA
6.7%

Healthcare

XRLX
6.6%
TDSA
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

XRLX
4.9%
TDSA
3.1%

Energy

XRLX
3.3%
TDSA
1.6%

Utilities

XRLX
3.2%
TDSA
1.0%

Basic Materials

XRLX
2.7%
TDSA
1.2%

Real Estate

XRLX
1.4%
TDSA
35.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLX vs. TDSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLX
XRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLX vs. TDSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF (TDSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRLXTDSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.92

XRLX vs. TDSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLXTDSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

Drawdowns

XRLX vs. TDSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRLX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than TDSA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLX and TDSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLXTDSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

0.00%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

Volatility

XRLX vs. TDSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLXTDSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

0.00%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

0.00%

+11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

0.00%

+11.05%

XRLX vs. TDSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSA's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRLX vs. TDSA - Dividend Comparison

XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while TDSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
TDSA
Cabana Target Drawdown 5 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLX
FundX Conservative ETF
2.57%2.77%1.66%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TDSA is cheaper at 0.83% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDSA is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.

XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for TDSA.

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 1.63% for XRLX and 0.83% for TDSA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLX and TDSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer