XRLX vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XRLX (FundX Conservative ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRLX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by FundX, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. XRLX is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, XRLX returned 12.60% vs 68.34% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. XRLX charges 1.63%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

XRLX vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRLX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

XRLX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 4.56%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLX vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF	5.63%	7.85%	17.61%	7.14%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-34.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLX and BITI is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2023	-0.36

The correlation between XRLX and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (1 year) to -0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XRLX vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLX

XRLX Risk / Return Rank: 52
XRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
XRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLX vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRLX	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.56	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.13	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.72	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.29	6.78	+1.51

XRLX vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRLX and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRLX vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRLX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLX and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRLX	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.33%	-92.16%	+76.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.28%	-25.28%	+19.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-85.94%	+83.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-68.34%	+66.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	10.11%	-8.59%

Volatility

XRLX vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX) is 4.01%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that XRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRLX	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	11.38%	-7.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	34.25%	-26.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.14%	44.14%	-35.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.18%	52.28%	-41.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.18%	52.28%	-41.10%

XRLX vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRLX vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
XRLX FundX Conservative ETF	2.63%	2.77%	1.66%	1.68%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRLX and BITI in my portfolio?

XRLX and BITI have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRLX or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to XRLX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRLX dropped -15.33% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, XRLX or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 12.60% for XRLX. On fees, BITI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, XRLX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRLX or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRLX or BITI?

BITI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.63% for XRLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRLX or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 2.63% for XRLX.

What is the main difference between XRLX and BITI?

XRLX is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: FundX and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.63% for XRLX and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.