XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO
XRE.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. XRE.TO is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRE.TO returned 1.97%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for XEQT.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.
Performance
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRE.TO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 13.22% return.
XRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRE.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF | 10.05% | 8.89% | -2.52% | 1.88% | -17.34% | 32.49% | -13.63% | 4.25% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 13.22% | 19.47% | 24.36% | 17.25% | -11.01% | 18.94% | 11.82% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRE.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XRE.TO and XEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRE.TO
XEQT.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
XRE.TO
XEQT.TO
Basic Materials
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Communication Services
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Consumer Defensive
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Energy
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Financial Services
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Healthcare
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Industrials
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Technology
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Utilities
XRE.TO
-
XEQT.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XRE.TO
XEQT.TO
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRE.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.48 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.70 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 16.13 | -11.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRE.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.62 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 1.07 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.96 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRE.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRE.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -29.74% | -27.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.51% | -8.25% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -15.08% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.53% | -19.56% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | 0.00% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -4.11% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.89% | +1.11% |
Volatility
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) is 3.32%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that XRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRE.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.70% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 9.41% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 11.65% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 13.13% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 15.56% | +2.01% |
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRE.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.47% | 1.66% | 2.01% | 2.07% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRE.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF | 4.47% | 5.00% | 5.55% | 4.52% | 4.85% | 2.59% | 4.45% | 4.82% | 4.80% | 4.71% | 5.20% | 5.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRE.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XRE.TO.
XRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XRE.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XRE.TO and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer