PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XRE.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. XRE.TO is passively managed, while ENCC.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRE.TO returned 4.75%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.

Performance

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRE.TO achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XRE.TO has underperformed ENCC.TO with an annualized return of 4.75%, while ENCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.

XRE.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.28%
YTD
9.55%
6M
11.63%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
4.75%

ENCC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.37%
YTD
29.01%
6M
25.71%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRE.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF		9.55%8.89%-2.52%1.88%-17.34%32.49%-13.63%21.91%5.66%9.27%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF		29.01%13.13%17.39%5.72%41.33%80.55%-27.98%6.54%-31.00%-18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XRE.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2011

0.21

The correlation between XRE.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XRE.TO
ENCC.TO

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

XRE.TO
100.0%
ENCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Energy

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Healthcare

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Technology

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Utilities

XRE.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF

Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF

Often compared with XRE.TO:
XRE.TO vs. ZRE.TOXRE.TO vs. VRE.TOXRE.TO vs. CGR.TOXRE.TO vs. XIC.TOXRE.TO vs. XDIV.TOXRE.TO vs. XBB.TOXRE.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with ENCC.TO:
ENCC.TO vs. ENCL.TOENCC.TO vs. EMAX.TOENCC.TO vs. ZEOENCC.TO vs. HMAX.TOENCC.TO vs. XEQT.TOENCC.TO vs. XDIV.TOENCC.TO vs. OILY.TO

Return for Risk

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XRE.TO
XRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XRE.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
2.98

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.48
3.81

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.53

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.93

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

17.54

-13.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRE.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XRE.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.98

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

1.11

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.00

+0.49

Drawdowns

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRE.TO and ENCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XRE.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-89.91%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-8.48%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-16.67%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.53%

-25.57%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.58%

-82.16%

+35.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-1.99%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-39.82%

+30.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.38%

+0.62%

Volatility

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) is 3.30%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that XRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XRE.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

5.66%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

12.36%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

14.08%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

23.03%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

29.05%

-11.48%

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRE.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF		11.09%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%
XRE.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF		4.49%5.00%5.55%4.52%4.85%2.59%4.45%4.82%4.80%4.71%5.20%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

XRE.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRE.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRE.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

XRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XRE.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRE.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer