XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO
XRE.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. XRE.TO is passively managed, while CASH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRE.TO returned 5.22%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRE.TO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.84% return.
XRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRE.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF | 10.05% | 8.89% | -2.52% | 1.88% | -17.34% | -0.67% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.84% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.39% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRE.TO and CASH.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XRE.TO
CASH.TO
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRE.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -31.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 7.50 | -6.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 112.00 | -110.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 470.40 | -466.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRE.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 10.38 | -9.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 5.52 | -5.03 |
Drawdowns
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRE.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRE.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -0.80% | -56.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.51% | -0.02% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -0.06% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | 0.00% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -0.00% | -9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.00% | +3.00% |
Volatility
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that XRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRE.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 0.06% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 0.13% | +8.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 0.22% | +11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 0.61% | +15.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 0.61% | +16.96% |
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRE.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
XRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRE.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF | 4.47% | 5.00% | 5.55% | 4.52% | 4.85% | 2.59% | 4.45% | 4.82% | 4.80% | 4.71% | 5.20% | 5.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRE.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XRE.TO.
XRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XRE.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for XRE.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer