PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRB.TO vs. BWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XRB.TO is traded in CAD, while BWX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BWX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRB.TO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than BWX's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XRB.TO has outperformed BWX with an annualized return of 0.06%, while BWX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.57% annualized return.


XRB.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.21%
YTD
2.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
1.50%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
0.06%

BWX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-2.15%
1Y
-1.02%
3Y*
2.36%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
-0.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRB.TO
iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF
2.56%0.05%3.95%-2.15%-15.01%-1.30%12.11%5.93%-1.23%-0.11%
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
-0.66%2.73%2.15%2.79%-14.00%-9.49%7.65%0.39%6.47%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XRB.TO and BWX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.38

Over the past year, XRB.TO and BWX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRB.TO vs. BWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRB.TO
XRB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XRB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BWX
BWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRB.TOBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.16

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

-0.32

+2.05

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the BWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRB.TO and BWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRB.TOBWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

-0.15

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.21

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.07

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.15

+0.12

Drawdowns

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRB.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum BWX drawdown of -29.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRB.TO and BWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRB.TOBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-29.58%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-6.43%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-6.43%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-24.69%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.58%

-29.58%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.56%

-18.05%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-8.47%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

3.19%

-1.41%

Volatility

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) at 2.29%. This indicates that XRB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRB.TOBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.29%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

5.11%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.85%

6.65%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

8.45%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

8.21%

+3.14%

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRB.TO vs. BWX - Dividend Comparison

XRB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than BWX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
2.37%2.19%1.99%1.63%1.23%0.93%0.95%1.16%1.07%0.46%0.00%0.00%
XRB.TO
iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF
3.63%3.73%2.36%2.36%1.83%1.23%1.36%1.72%1.74%1.69%1.58%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRB.TO and BWX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XRB.TO.

XRB.TO is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BWX is International Government Bonds. XRB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Real Return Bond Index, while BWX tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury x US Capped (Inception 8/31/2007). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XRB.TO and 0.35% for BWX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRB.TO and BWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer