XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE
XQUI.DE (Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XQUI.DE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. XQUI.DE is actively managed, while XMME.DE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XQUI.DE returned 5.69%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XQUI.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQUI.DE achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
XQUI.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 17.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQUI.DE Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C | 9.30% | 8.51% | 11.29% | 11.79% | -14.62% | 14.16% | 3.47% | 22.69% | -9.09% | 1.24% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQUI.DE and XMME.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XQUI.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XQUI.DE
XMME.DE
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C (XQUI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQUI.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.55 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.98 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | 18.04 | -5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQUI.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 3.00 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.45 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQUI.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum XMME.DE drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUI.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQUI.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -31.96% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.12% | -10.67% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -19.16% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.16% | -24.38% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.04% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -9.53% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 2.95% | -1.61% |
Volatility
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C (XQUI.DE) is 3.89%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XQUI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQUI.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 7.48% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 14.90% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 17.70% | -8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 16.74% | -6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 18.61% | -7.42% |
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQUI.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQUI.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XQUI.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XQUI.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XQUI.DE.
XQUI.DE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for XQUI.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for XQUI.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer